The Many Lives of Hugh Everett III
Peter Byrne investigates the troubled genius behind parallel universes.
April 10, 2009
He certainly had a beautiful mind. This exceptionally gifted Princeton mathematician made key insights in game theory, yet throughout his life, he was haunted by personal demons. But this isnít the story of John Nash, complete with Nobel Prize, best-selling biography and Oscar-winning movie. Itís the story of the equally compelling Hugh Everett III, the man who proposed the Many-Worlds theory of quantum mechanics.
Everett is not being depicted by Russell Crowe in a big Hollywood movie (yet). But this physics genius is finally having his story told thanks to Peter Byrne
, a California-based investigative reporter, with help from a $35,000 FQXi grant.
Byrneís normal beat is "corporate and government malfeasance," a far cry from quantum physics and parallel worlds. But, in 2000, his friend Stephen Shenker
, a physicist at Stanford University in California, introduced Byrne to what he calls "weird physics." After writing several popular physics articles Byrne was looking for another good story. What better than the man who invented the theory of multiple universes?
Everett would have been Dr.
Cold War technocrat.
- Peter Byrne
The seasoned reporter tackled the story like any other investigative assignment. His first "informant" was a Russian physics textbook printer, Eugene Shikhovtsev, who had written an online biography
of Everett. Byrne became enthralled with the anti-hero Everett, an alcoholic who suffered from depression, and died before seeing his ideaóinitially dismissed as nonsensicalógain the respect it deserved.
As Byrne investigated, a picture began to emerge of a deeply troubled individual with tremendous gifts.
Everettís early home life was highly dysfunctional. His military father and artistic mother divorced at a time when you still had to travel to Mexico to break the marital bond. Everett never really reconciled with his mother, who also suffered from depression, but he adored his father.
Academically, however, Everett always stood out. In his first year at grad school at Princeton, he hung out with many pioneering game theorists and wrote a paper that is still considered a classic in the discipline.
In his second year, he attracted the venerable John Wheeler
, a fundamental contributor to the fields of quantum mechanics and general relativity, as his thesis supervisor. It was Everettís Ph.D. thesis that contains his revolutionary and lasting "Many Worlds" theory.
Byrne discovered new materials about the theory when he met with Everettís only son, Mark
, who fronts the band "Eels
." In his basement, Mark had kept boxes upon boxes of his dadís belongings and documents.
A BEAUTIFUL MIND
Hugh Everett in 1964
Credit: Mark Everett
"The basement was a biographerís dream to find untouched materials of that nature," said Byrne. "I found the handwritten draft of the original thesis. I found three little papers about certain elements of his theory that shed some light on his real thinking. It actually reinvigorated a lot of the discussion about what Everett really meant."
Everett was looking into the fundamental puzzle of measurement in quantum mechanics. In the 1920s, some of the founding fathers of quantum theory met in Copenhagen and decided upon what has become its standard interpretation
: Before observation, quantum objects donít exist in a single state, but are described by a wavefunction containing a superposition of multiple states, exemplified by SchrŲdingerís cat in a box that is both alive and dead at the same time. When a measurement is made, however, the wavefunction "collapses" and the quantum object snaps into one set state.
The basement was a
biographer’s dream. I
found the handwritten draft
of the original thesis.
- Peter Byrne
But Everett wasnít content with this picture. In essence, he wondered why a wavefunction should collapse just because an observer interacts with it. He argued that you donít need collapse if the observer becomes entangled with the superpositioned object. Instead, due to the correlation between the observer and the object, the observer splits into multiple copies. Each quantum option is satisfiedóthe cat both lives and diesójust in two parallel worlds.
Wheeler was impressed and presented the idea to quantum heavyweight Niels Bohr
, who was largely responsible for the Copenhagen interpretation. But Bohr dismissed it. As a result, the thesis was cut by almost three quarters and reformulated to minimize disagreement with Bohr. When it was published in 1957, it didnít generate much immediate response.
Bohrís rejection displeased Everett, but he had not planned to stay in academia. Before his thesis was published, he took a job with a Pentagon think-tank that studied how to fight nuclear wars. There he discovered that radioactive fallout would be much worse than anyone had previously imagined. He also worked on optimizing the "cost-benefit" of both offensive nuclear weapons and defensive systems. And he wrote much of the original software for the first Single Integrated Operating Program, the ultra-secret hydrogen bomb targeting list.
Here’s this guy designing
multiple scenarios for World
War Three that believes that
there are multiple universes
where his designs are
- Peter Byrne
"Everett himself would have been Dr. Strangelove," says Byrne. "He was the quintessential Cold War technocrat. Hereís this guy who is actually designing multiple scenarios for World War Three that believes that there are multiple universes where his designs are being implemented. Yet he did it anyway."
But while Everett was building a career for himself far away from esoteric questions about parallel worlds, his earlier work was gaining an underground following. One of the former students of Wheeler that Byrne spoke to was Wojciech Zurek
, now at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, who explained that Everett gave a generation of physicists the permission to look at the universe quantum mechanically. This stood in stark contrast to Bohrís interpretation, which said that you can only talk about the universe in classical terms.
In the 1960s and 70s, Bryce DeWitt, a theoretical physicist and acting editor for the journal Reviews of Modern Physics, which published Everettís thesis
, championed Everettís idea. Although DeWitt wasnít originally convinced by the outlandish idea, Everettís sharp wit won him over. When DeWitt wrote to Everett saying that he "could not feel himself split," Everett retorted that critics of Copernicus also said they could not feel themselves moving through the heavens.
Meanwhile, Everett and some colleagues had formed a private company that ran classified computational problems for the Pentagon. But, after several years, the business went under and Everett ended up working on relatively uninteresting computational problems just to make a living.
MEETING OF MINDS, 1955
(LĖ R) Charles W. Misner, Hale F. Trotter, Niels Bohr, Hugh Everett, David Harrison
Credit: Eugene Shikhovtsev
Personally, Everett was also struggling. An alcoholic, he drank three martini lunches and womanized in the work place and beyond. He ate raw hamburger and smoked three packs of cigarettes a day. More importantly, he was totally disconnected from his family. He was surprised, despite numerous warning signs, when his teenage daughter tried to commit suicide just one month before Everett himself died of a massive heart attack in 1982 at just 51 years of age.
Sadly, Everett didnít live to see his work gain the great following amongst physicists and cosmologists that it now commands. Several prominent quantum computer scientists believe that the power of quantum computers comes from the ability for superpositioned elements to compute complex problems in other universes and reassemble an answer in this universe. In 2007, the 50th anniversary of Everettís theory was celebrated on the cover of the journal Nature
Of course, the theory remains controversial, and many find it just too hard to swallow. More seriously, Christopher Fuchs
, a long term visitor and physicist at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, believes it is a contentless interpretation, that is, it doesnít tell us anything beyond the Copenhagen interpretation that could lead to new developments in quantum foundations.
"It was a reaction to the Copenhagen interpretation that went in a particular direction, and it was a healthy move because ultimately one does want to get away from thinking about observers as an integral part of quantum mechanics and it does do that," says Fuchs. "But, what price do you pay for a view of the world that is not very particular to that world?"
Byrne doesnít have a science background, but he believes that his investigative journalism past has been a major asset in uncovering Everettís story. "One of my skills is to read through vast amounts of government gobbledy-gook and emerge with some interesting facts. Well, now Iíve read through vast numbers of physics papersóalthough I read around the equations for the most partóand emerged with enough interesting facts for a book."
It’s digging deep beneath
the surface and finding
real evidence of what’s
going on among the human beings.
- Stephen Shenker on Byrne's skills
Shenker agrees that, as journalist, Byrne illuminates new aspects of Everettís life, giving a very detailed picture of a great scientist who had deep human flaws.
"Peter teased out through documents, essential elements of the story," says Shenker. "Itís not just a question of taking an article in print and trying to understand what it means. Itís digging deep beneath the surface and finding real evidence of whatís going on among the human beings that wrote this story."
So, does Byrne believe that there is a world where Everett didnít live a tortured, miserable life?
"When you look at how people are dealing with probability in the branching universe, our universe is more or less what most universes are like that Everett could have ended up in, so in most universes he wasnít a very happy camper," says Byrne. "But, there still would be uncountable numbers in which he was not only happy but his theory won the Nobel Prize."
Please read the important Introduction that governs your
participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
MANFRED wrote on January 19, 2012
Thus, the problem of parallel universe for you, too, is of interest, I decided to write to you and ask to read twenty-first chapter, "Revelation," where, I think, St. John gives a symbolic description ofa parallel universe. My article "hereafter OR DIVINE UNIVERSEUNIVERSE" in Russian and English is available at www.tracts.com / MB.html, where I tried to decipher the 21 chapters of "Revelation."For me it is very important to know on this subject for your opinion.Regards Manfred Beglaryan. The...
CYBERBEACH wrote on August 19, 2010
David, if you don't accept the MWI, then I guess you believe Peter Byrne simultaneously both believed MWI and didn't believe MWI until you asked and he answered, at which point the wave function collapsed and he only disbelieved.
Whereas I think that in another universe, Peter Byrne does believe in the MWI, and that you have only discovered that you are in the branch where he doesn't.
As have I... :)
DAVID wrote on June 21, 2010
read all article comments
Byrne, you actually believe MWI?