Search FQXi


RECENT BLOG COMMENTS

Eckard Blumschein: "Pentcho and Peter, To what degree do you agree on: "the crucial assumption..." in Some-When

Tommy Gilbertson: "Locomoting Whilst Minimizing Cost OxyMorons, Koans & Locomotion..." in The Secret History of...

Edwin Klingman: "Well this certainly stimulated some interesting comments. I'll take a while..." in The Secret History of...

Jason Wolfe: "Dear Sridattadev, If you are looking for Universal spiritual bliss, you..." in The Whole and Nothing But

Jason Wolfe: "Dear Paul, You said, "It is one thing to have a theoretical explanation,..." in Hanny's Voorwerp, and...

James Putnam: "Paul, Before you score any points with me about avoiding derogatory..." in Hanny's Voorwerp, and...

Lawrence B. Crowell: "I just can’t let this slide by! It was proven by Euler nearly 300 years..." in The Whole and Nothing But

John Merryman: "Paul, "Physical reality can only be that which is potentially sensorily..." in On the Origins of Quantum...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

The Cosmic Family Tree
Mapping the ancestral history of spacetime in an effort to unite quantum mechanics and general relativity.

Behind the Shadows
Imagining Schrödinger’s cat peering out from behind a black hole could lead to a theory of quantum gravity.

Why Did Nature Choose Quantum Theory?
Schrödinger’s cat may help reveal while some physical theories are better at describing reality than others.

Video Article: Through a Glass Darkly
Eight-dimensional numbers could be needed to handle string-theory’s 10-dimensional physics. This classic article, with new video content, also tackles the mystery of why elementary particles come in families of three—and maybe even how spacetime emerges in 4-dimensions.

Video Article: Evolving Time's Arrow
Why do we perceive time marching in one direction? In this classic article with new video, Craig Callender combines general relativity, evolutionary biology and cognitive science to bring the physics of time in line with everyday experience.


FQXI ARTICLE
February 9, 2012

Natural Selection in Action
by Anil Ananthaswamy
November 10, 2009
Bookmark and Share


COULD QUANTUM DOTS PROVE QUANTUM DARWINISM
Credit: Lin-Wang Wang, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Darwin could back up his ideas on natural selection by looking at the characteristics of birds and animals. But how can we catch "quantum natural selection" in the act?

In 2007, Wojciech Zurek of the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, and his former student, Robin Blume-Kohout of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, developed a computer model in which a "quantum pendulum" was set oscillating according to the laws of quantum mechanics. Such an oscillator can exist in a superposition of states, simultaneously present in all possible locations along its path. The duo modeled the environment by including thousands of other pendulums nearby, each "swinging" at a different frequency.

If quantum Darwinism is correct, the environmental pendulums should record a copy of the quantum pendulum’s position. And that is what it did. Multiple copies of the same quantum state were replicated throughout the environment. The model showed quantum Darwinism in action.

In addition, early this year, Roland Brunner of the University of Leoben in Austria and his colleagues showed quantum Darwinism, in theory, in an array of quantum dots—nanoscale bits of semiconducting materials, with electrons that can exist in a superposition of states.

The team studied what happens when multiple dots are arrayed in series and also interact with the environment. They found that two adjacent quantum dots gave rise to a special quantum state that was peculiar to their interaction, and not merely a combination of states of individual quantum dots.

More importantly, they showed that they could find out about these special states by looking at individual quantum dots. It’s as if stable states had been copied and imprinted on all the individual dots. All observers would see the same objective reality—thanks to quantum Darwinism.

Return to the main article.

Comment on this Article

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)



Important: In order to combat spam, please select the letter in this menu between 'G' and 'I':





Please enter your e-mail address: