Search FQXi


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Paul Reed: "Marcoen "for every individual it is an absolute certainty that he exists...." in An Essay Concerning Human...

Paul Reed: "Marcoen "I side with Kant: by sensory observation we cannot possibly get..." in An Essay Concerning Human...

Joe Fisher: "Although the author of this mercifully short masterpiece of abstract..." in Basic Information...

Rick Delmonico: "It appears that humans can perceive the future at very short intervals...." in Physical Reality - On...

Alan Kadin: "Dr. Ojo, I enjoyed reading your elegantly written essay, with its theme of..." in On The Road Not Taken by...

Rick Delmoico: "Beyond I do not own my heart But I have no-one to blame when it wanders ..." in Physical Reality - On...

Lawrence Crowell: "I just pulled up your essay and gave it a quick reading. It is not..." in It From Bit is...

Joe Fisher: "Vladimir, Your gracious comments are much appreciated. The main point I..." in THE CLOUD OF UNKNOWING...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Discord in the Quantum World
An alternative quantum resource to entanglement could help physicists in the quest to construct a quantum computer.

A View From the Top
Thinking of causation as a "two-way street"—along which the passage of information can be inverted—could have implications for the origin of life.

Classic Article: Black Holes, Paradox Regained
In 2004, Stephen Hawking famously conceded that black holes do not devour all information when they swallow matter—seemingly resolving the "black hole information paradox" that had perplexed physicists for decades. But some argue that the paradox remains open, and we must abandon our simple picture of spacetime to unravel it.

Quantum Biology: Making Waves in the Natural World
Could quantum effects explain the mechanisms behind smell, photosynthesis and bird navigation?

The Accidental Universe
Have we been fooled into seeing one form of reality, with particular fundamental forces and laws, based on the peculiar way that we have chosen to measure time?


FQXI ARTICLE
May 23, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Comment on this Article

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)



Important: In order to combat spam, please select the letter in this menu between 'X' and 'Z':




Recent Comments


There appear to be 2 questions raised by the article.

The first being does the structure of black holes show that there is non locality? The second being why doesn't an electron fall into the nucleus of an atom?

Assumptions have been made about black holes and the theory has grown out of those assumptions.In my opinion those original assumptions are incorrect.

A galaxy can be visualised as a gravity well as there is a greater density of matter and greater angular momentum...


this is relevant.


Local observations should not mean a measure takes place by default?

If I observe a speck of dust, at the very horizon of my local field of vision, then I can recieve this information without actually disturbing the speck of dust. It is the photon which hits the speck of dust, and enters my eye that allows me to examine the speck of dust. This process is not measure, it is one way observation?

Now interestingly one way observation, can allow information from a far off non-local...

read all article comments

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.