Search FQXi


If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
FQXi FORUM
June 19, 2013

ARTICLE: A Deeper Understanding [back to article]
Bookmark and Share

paul valletta wrote on Oct. 20, 2007 @ 00:53 GMT
So what if the Electron contains a "space-like", singularity, and the Photon has a corrosponding "time-like" singularity?.."spacetime" as one, in the context of Einsteins theory of GR, would have continuos functional parimiters in Macro systems, whilst having discrete and non-local functional parimiters at the (planck-scale?).

In a macro domains, the fact there is continuous varying distance between structures, ie observers and locations permits a "spacetime" field of observation. The compacted domain of QM do not allow certain volumes to "share" locations, spacetime splits into separate and discontinous paths. If spacetime structures have a direction quantities, then if one squeezes them to a finite and compact volume, then, say the up-spin of a Photon, would be "overlapped" with its down spin state, they would reverse?

Entanglement shows this at quantum levels, then as the Electrons and Photons are the usual detected quantities needed for observational spacetime "reality", then one would expect there would be a "broken" or sperated spacetime at a certain finite limit, an Electron space singularity, and a Photon time singularity, moving away in the wrong directions?

report post as inappropriate



Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.