Search FQXi

If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Wilhelmus Wilde: on 6/25/12 at 16:11pm UTC, wrote In the reductionist way of thinking we meet all kind of problems when...

Zeeya Merali: on 6/25/12 at 15:43pm UTC, wrote A short post to highlight a discussion around one of our recent podcasts....


Jason Wolfe: "Would it be improper laymen etiquette to repeat what I've said before that..." in The Quantum Pet Store:...

Thomas Ray: "John, don't confuse chaos with probabilism. You write: " ... when we can..." in Pilot Wave Hydrodynamics

John Merryman: "Eckard, Physics values precision over explanation, so measurement matters..." in Q&A with Paul Davies:...

Georgina Parry: "Peter, I would really like to know if the experiment has been done and what..." in Your Invitation to FQXi's...

Eckard Blumschein: "John M, Davies doesn't call time an effect. Perhaps you are at best one of..." in Q&A with Paul Davies:...

Stefan Weckbach: "Peter, "Single photon experiments can do so." I now ask what experiment..." in The Quantum Pet Store:...

Akinbo Ojo: "Peter thanks for reply, (Also to any community member with an opinion), To..." in Faster than Light

Herb Wiggins: "First, Occam's Razor is very likely a kind of least energy principle. That..." in Quantifying Occam

click titles to read articles

Quantifying Occam
Is the simplest answer always the best? Connecting Medieval monks to computational complexity, using the branch of mathematics known as category theory.

Heart of Darkness
An intrepid physicist attempts to climb into the core of black hole.

Why Quantum?
Entropy could explain why nature chose to play by quantum rules.

Reality's NeverEnding Story
A quantum version of Darwinian natural selection could enable the universe to write itself into being.

The Quantum Dictionary
Mark Van Raamsdonk is re-writing how we define the shape of our universe. Can such translations help to unite quantum theory and gravity?

September 17, 2014

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: A Table-Top Test for Quantum Gravity [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Jun. 25, 2012 @ 15:43 GMT
A short post to highlight a discussion around one of our recent podcasts. In the April edition of the podcast, I chatted with FQXi’s Markus Aspelmeyer about a proposal for a table-top test for quantum gravity that he and his colleagues had outlined in Nature Physics. The idea is to look for modifications to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty principle due to quantum gravity models, using microscale mirrors in the lab.

During the podcast, we mentioned that Sabine Hossenfelder was quite sceptical about this -- she blogged her concerns that the team failed to address the question of Lorentz-invariance here.

Now one of the paper’s co-authors, Caslav Brukner, has written a response, so I’m inviting you to head over to the podcast thread (and over to Sabine’s Backreaction blog where the same comment has been posted) to discuss that.

report post as inappropriate

Wilhelmus de Wilde wrote on Jun. 25, 2012 @ 16:11 GMT
In the reductionist way of thinking we meet all kind of problems when reaching the Planck scale. Try the "emergence" way, and a lot of things become easier to understand but also to explain.


report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.