Search FQXi


If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
FQXi FORUM
May 19, 2013

ARTICLE: DoubleThink [back to article]
Bookmark and Share

Roumen Tsekov wrote on Mar. 8, 2008 @ 14:12 GMT
This is an interesting topic but the basic idea is due to the quantum superposition. Recently it was realized that macroscopic systems (computers are also macroscopic devices) will obey a nonlinear Schrodinger equation (see for instance arXiv:0711.1442 attached bellow). Hence, the superposition principle is no more valid.

attachments: 0711.1442.pdf

report post as inappropriate

Eckard Blumschein replied on Jan. 30, 2010 @ 20:31 GMT
Already Rafael Bombelli (1526-1573) understood that any complex number occurs together with its conjugate (suo Residuo), cf. Helmut Gericke, Geschichte des Zahlbegriffs. Accordingly, a complex representation of a real world quantity is redundant. It does not convey more information as compared with the seemingly poorer real-valued one. I will reconsider this as soon as the first quantum computer shows its claimed superiority.

Eckard Blumschein

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


paul valletta wrote on Mar. 10, 2008 @ 15:19 GMT
"How much information is really there in a quantum state?"

And how does one go about counting or accounting it?

How far back into the past does a Quantum State remain intact, what memory of a previous state does a Q-bit have/retain?

To possibly be in "Two Places at Once", one really has to define "place" , what here is meant place?..is this the same as being in "two space's" at one instant of time?..so thus a particle can be in ANY two location of the future, or ANY two locations of a past, but curiously NEVER in a single location of the present/now?

To be at two seperated locations "in a superposition", one has to be isolated from the "time" that governs both loctions, thus external to a 4-Dimensional space-time.

Has there been a single recorded example of an Electron being detected in a single place, ie a definate "now"?

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


Add a New Post
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)



Important: In order to combat spam, please select the letter in this menu between 'A' and 'C':





Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.