Search FQXi


Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
FQXi FORUM
February 11, 2012

ARTICLE: Squishy Bedrock [back to article]
Bookmark and Share

paul valletta wrote on Mar. 27, 2008 @ 09:10 GMT
So if there are many Universe's, convieniently suppresing the awkward questions from certain Universe, like the one I reside within, then I suppose there will be young Universe's where Einstein never existed, so the whole of GR is meaninless, and of course some Universes where Quantum Mechanics do not exist! So one can really make up any laws whatsoever, how about the "new" number theory based not on 10, but on the number six, just happens to be the numbers that convieniently fit onto the geometric shaped dice, any number above six is a 4 number variable!

The Q-RAY Process ?

There is a recent paper

Seth Lloyd

in which there are interesting handwaving, or quantum_ranging process, or Q-RAYS ?

Take the Quantum Light that Seth propose's, now using an entangled photon, one can send it into a box containing shoedingers cat. Then, according to Seth's paper, one can take a "quantum_image" of the cat, thereby confirming its existence, either alive or dead, without the cat or detector actually knowing it is being investigated.

The H.U.P gets violated by fact the Q-Rays confirms not only existence, but non-existence, which make location and momentum 100% factual?

Perhaps the Parrallel Universe is inside/outside the mind of a creator/observer , and thew interaction of existence is paramount and fundemental to all?

Do we need other Universe's with their other Laws? are ther many Universe's with a single Law, or just one Universe with multiple Laws?

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


paul valletta wrote on Apr. 1, 2008 @ 04:06 GMT
Actually Marcus Aspelayer has a great collaborated recent

paper[/limk] and it really does reveal fascinating Quantum measure avenue's.

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


paul valletta wrote on Apr. 1, 2008 @ 04:09 GMT
Please forgive marcus should read "Markus".

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


paul valletta wrote on Apr. 1, 2008 @ 14:07 GMT
This is the missing link to a new overwiew by

Markus

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


Add a New Post
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)



Important: In order to combat spam, please select the letter in this menu between 'M' and 'O':





Please enter your e-mail address: