home
January 7, 2009


Forum Home

Introduction
Terms of Use
Login

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help


Recent Blog Comments

Peter Morgan: "Rather than allowing an author to delete posts they don't like, which al..." in The End of Time (The E...

amrit: "Dear Prof. Zeh Regarding your statement """"The most important prejud..." in Nonlocality versus non...

amrit: "Hi Anthony It was great for me to join discussion on time and see what ..." in The End of Time (The E...

Kate: "I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along. I thought..." in Cosmology for Kids, FQ...

Lost in Space: "I guess in part it depends how "real" the universe is and what sort of r..." in Shutdown of the LHC, b...

Count Iblis: "William, thanks for the links to these interesting articles!" in Impact

Count Iblis: "The experimentalists can experiment and interpret as much as they like. ..." in Has Superluminal Tunne...

intereesting: "hmm maybe they were right" in Shutdown of the LHC, b...

Recent Articles
click titles to download PDF files

Back to Mach
Want a theory of quantum gravity? Then look to the man who inspired Einstein.

The End of the Quantum Road?
Have we already found the ultimate theory of nature, without realizing it?

The Universe's Odyssey?
How our youthful universe may have wandered the string landscape in search of home—with help from its anti-universe counterpart.

Hunting for Theories of (Not) Everything
The architect of "doubly special relativity" wants to probe the quantum nature of spacetime—one step at a time.

Quantum Darwinism
How does objective reality emerge from quantum fuzziness? It's a case of the survival of the fittest.


2008 Essay Contest

Don't miss the inaugural FQXi Essay Contest! read | submit

FQXi BLOGS

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Dark Matter: the Lighter Side [refresh]
William Orem (blogger) wrote on Mar. 29, 2008 @ 20:01 GMT
image: fdecomite


I’m not a nut, but I entertain at least one nutty idea. I can’t imagine any way for my nutty idea to be tested (that hasn’t stopped string theory), and I don’t see why anyone would want to test my idea—it’s nutty. But since it’s April 1st, I’m throwing gravitas to the wind and posting my nutty idea. (Hey, I read yours.)

Here’s how it goes.

Step 1: The rotational speeds of galaxies only make sense if they have much more mass than we can see—some kind of hidden material that is holding the disk together but doesn’t radiate at any wavelength. This leaves cosmologists positing that a bizarre type of non-baryonic matter in fact makes up the vast majority of the universe.

Rather than accept that, a number of people are working on the idea of baryonic dark matter: normal stuff, but somehow rendered invisible. Black holes? Brown dwarves? Supermassive planets?

Step 2: Enrico Fermi famously wondered where everybody in the galaxy was. Stay with me here.

In short, the rapidity of life’s appearance on Earth virtually as soon as the bombardment period ended some four billion years ago, and the rapidity of its evolution from blue-green algae up to the conscious entity reading this blog post, suggests that life is both ubiquitous and fast-evolving. The development of reflexive consciousness, tool use, and a disposition for territory expansion all seem like good candidates for trends that confer evolutionary advantage. Given the twelve billion year age of the Milky Way, what Nicolai Kardashev designated “Type 2 civilizations” should thus not only have come into existence (over and over again, in fact), they should have spread across the entire galaxy by now. Reasonable enough predictions have put the time required for complete colonization at between five and fifty million years, which is nothin’ -- the former being only 0.05 percent the age of the galaxy.

So, Fermi and Frank Tipler and others asked, why don’t we see them everywhere we look?

Step 3: In a 1959 paper in Science, Freeman Dyson speculated that the natural evolution of civilizations would be toward the development of energy-capturing shells that completely envelop their host stars – the famous “Dyson Sphere” (swarm, bubble, etc.).

Step 4: QED.

Get it? Fermi was right; Dyson was right. The hidden mass is in fact millions of stars whose radiant energy is completely occluded by Dyson sphere technology. 14.5 billion years is enough time for roughly 90% of the radiant energy in the universe to be sealed off by Type 2 civilizations, leaving the majority of the mass of any given galaxy only detectable by its gravitational effects.

Hey! The answer to the Dark Matter Riddle is the answer to the Fermi Paradox: We do, in fact, see advanced civilizations in every direction. Their activity can be inferred from the mismatch between the number of exposed stars and the obviously far greater galactic mass.

Okay, okay, I’ll stop. But you heard it here first.

(Note: Actually, while I was composing this post “anonymous” beat me to the punch. In 10,000 years or so when our nutty idea is confirmed we will debate which of us was Darwin and which one Wallace.)
this post has been edited by the author since its original submission
rw wrote on Mar. 29, 2008 @ 22:41 GMT
Why not skip the Dyson sphere and directly attribute a gravitational effect to consciousness?
rw wrote on Mar. 29, 2008 @ 22:52 GMT
The missing mass then being a measure of fertility.

And a physical meaning to galaxies as living organisms.
Frans Faase wrote on Mar. 30, 2008 @ 14:37 GMT
For a Dyson Sphere to work, it would merely modify the spectrum of the total energy outputted by the star it surrounds. If the Dyson Sphere would shield all energy produced by the nuclear processes inside a star it itself would become hotter and hotter over time. It is a common mistake to think that energy is needed for life to exist, while actually it a difference in energy.
rw wrote on Apr. 2, 2008 @ 13:57 GMT
consciousness as gravity is of course a goof but here is a paper arguing that gravity is the consequence of relative intensity of information processing:

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0801/0801.0337.pdf

 

Add a New Post

  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit Your Post" button below. You may also optionally add images and file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

Your name: (optional)

Attachments

You may optionally attach up to two documents to your post. To add an attachment, use the following feature to browse your computer and select the file to attach. The maximum file size for attachments is 1MB.

Attachment #1:

Attachment #2:

Once you're done adding file attachments, click the "Submit Your Post" button to add your post.