Search FQXi


If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
FQXi FORUM
May 24, 2013

ARTICLE: Two for the Road [back to article]
Bookmark and Share

Plato wrote on Jul. 11, 2008 @ 00:26 GMT
http://eskesthai.blogspot.com/2008/07/intellectual-defeatism
.html?showComment=1215704040000#c6917934854461833434

While this is of course some interest to me, I thought any description that would give us some more information about what exists in the valleys, is a furthering of what work is considered in relation to Stanley Mandelstam and topos.

An interesting and furthering of the understanding currently held by those who had thought it contained limitions to a genus 2 figure, has been moved now to included a genus three consideration.

While the relationship is more friendly, I would see them in context of Poincare and Klein in the development of topology.

I find resonance with this effort.

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


amrit wrote on Jan. 17, 2009 @ 09:44 GMT
you are right, gravity is a result of quantum structure of space and has nothing to do with time

attachments: 1_Time_is_a_measure_of_motion_in_Space_Sorli__2009__arXiv.doc

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


Steve Dufourny wrote on Feb. 18, 2009 @ 19:33 GMT
Hi all,

I also agree, the quantum structure implies the gravity, I remain persuaded that the coded ultimate particle implies the rest, and its rotation speed on itself even is directly bound with the gravity and thus the mass.All turns and implies the gravity. Combinations are numerous .Imagine an ultimate spherical system with its codes and its rotations implying the gravities or the gravity.

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


Georgina Parry wrote on Mar. 7, 2009 @ 05:29 GMT
I first came across the idea of topological fields in relation to biological development over 20 years ago in a Book by Brian Leith called The descent of Darwin. It was my favourite book for some time.It asks interesting questions, such as can we separate pattern from process? Topology may be used to identify the pattern but the process gives rise to that pattern.

It was a pity that the article was mostly about the couple getting along well together and their personalities complementing each other, which I hope long continues. Rather than actually talking in any depth about their work.

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


Georgina Parry wrote on Mar. 24, 2009 @ 09:09 GMT
Amrit, if gravity is nothing to do with time, how do you explain gravitational time dilation?

The unknowable objective reality within the void of space and its disturbance due to motion of matter along the 4th spatio-energetic dimension (currently imagined as the abstract deformation of empty space itself) gives rise to gravity and subjective time. Motion, structure, gravity and time are all linked together in The Prime Quaternion model and observation of time dilation is thus predicted by it.

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


Add a New Post
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)



Important: In order to combat spam, please select the letter in this menu between 'K' and 'M':





Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.