Search FQXi

If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Eric S.: on 1/10/09 at 1:48am UTC, wrote I love the downright Blakean response this kind of topic can evidently...

John Baryczka: on 12/30/08 at 13:43pm UTC, wrote Accepting Reality. The gap between the Dreamer and the Academic, the...

William Orem: on 8/28/08 at 13:19pm UTC, wrote Because this is FQXi, I want to post another radical suggestion – this...


Vladimir Rogozhin: "Dear friends, The helplessness of international organizations in..." in How Should Humanity Steer...

Thomas Ray: ""Tom, physics has inferred that information law-of-nature relationships..." in Why Quantum?

Thomas Ray: ""Not all motion is relative. There is also Absolute Motion." How would one..." in Why Quantum?

Akinbo Ojo: "Thanks Oscar for your reply. Not just 'profound'. In my opinion,..." in Quantum theory escapes...

Stefan Weckbach: "Dear Max and all, my burning question is wether or not i inwardly moved..." in Your Invitation to FQXi's...

John Merryman: "It is an interesting selection, but I'm not seeing many which really..." in Your Invitation to FQXi's...

Thomas Ray: "Link to Mermin paper: ..." in Quantum theory escapes...

Tim Rappl: "~TB$ 'tweren't per se I who intended those spaces in the links!!! ..." in The limits of mathematics

click titles to read articles

Quantifying Occam
Is the simplest answer always the best? Connecting Medieval monks to computational complexity, using the branch of mathematics known as category theory.

Heart of Darkness
An intrepid physicist attempts to climb into the core of black hole.

Why Quantum?
Entropy could explain why nature chose to play by quantum rules.

Reality's NeverEnding Story
A quantum version of Darwinian natural selection could enable the universe to write itself into being.

The Quantum Dictionary
Mark Van Raamsdonk is re-writing how we define the shape of our universe. Can such translations help to unite quantum theory and gravity?

August 21, 2014

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Life Before Earth [refresh]
Bookmark and Share

Blogger William Orem wrote on Aug. 28, 2008 @ 13:19 GMT

Because this is FQXi, I want to post another radical suggestion – this time related to the possibility of life on the moon.

Before I do, though, one reader has asked a reasonable follow-up question to the last post: why was NASA ever concerned about “lunar germs”? How could microbes have gotten to the moon in the first place?

About NASA’s quarantine program back in...

view entire post

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

John Baryczka wrote on Dec. 30, 2008 @ 13:43 GMT
Accepting Reality.

The gap between the Dreamer and the Academic, the Historian and the Physicist, the Inventor and the Mathematician seems just too big to our own detriment. Religious wars start through ignorance and bigotry and modern man denies the very roots of his existance. OK then folks, just "who" was around to record the Earth as being a hothouse (EDEN) surrounded by the up to three...

view entire post

report post as inappropriate

Eric S. wrote on Jan. 10, 2009 @ 01:48 GMT
I love the downright Blakean response this kind of topic can evidently elicit!

Regarding your blog post though:

I think the notion of transpermia is very enticing, and not too hard to believe. After all, endolithic life can be extremely hardy and long-lasting. There are also (less extreme) models for sort of thing on Earth. For example, microscopic coral larva are broadcast throughout our planet’s oceans on the off chance they will happen to end up in waters of exactly the right temperature, depth, etc. to support a new colony. It’s not impossible to imagine that a similar model might function at the scale of solar systems. In fact it’s a rather reassuring thought.

Transpermia is also a fun idea to play around with. I remember reading a cold-war era science fiction story that involved an advanced hominid race which was (tragically!) too warlike for its own good. They end up blowing themselves up (and their entire home planet too!) in a final, all-out war. The lone narrator (sitting on a space station, I presume) realizes that the chunks of his beloved home world whizzing past him are ripe with bacteria, and he flashes on the idea that total, globally-annihilating nuclear war is part of the natural cycle for “planetary life”, that nuclear war is a planet’s (literally orgasmic?) way of reproducing.

About the possibility that dormant lunar endoliths might have originated on Earth and survived on the moon’s surface *from it’s very moment of creation*, this seems a little unlikely to me. You say that “most of what was ejected would be molten, but not all of it.” Even if some of the ejecta was not initially molten, wouldn’t it have become molten pretty quickly when it combined with the rest of the matter that forms our moon? I admit I have a difficult time imagining what this cataclysmic event would have looked like, but with the amount of energy required to liberate that much matter from the home planet’s gravity well, it seems like there would be a lot of heat left over for a very long time.

Certainly endolithic microbes could have been ejected from subsequent impacts and made it to the Moon’s surface once it had already cooled, but this wouldn’t provide the same kind of snapshot of “pre-biosphere earth biota”.

Thanks for the blog post. Fascinating stuff!

report post as inappropriate

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.