Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT BLOG COMMENTS

ed hardy: "The link is dead! Have somebody this clip on computer? ed hardy t-shirts" in The Great Dome of the Sky

Jason Wolfe: "On the topic of aliens, I reached out for help from a particular alien..." in Astrotheology: Do Aliens...

Lawrence B. Crowell: "Mathematical physics has extended far ahead of experimental and..." in Astrotheology: Do Aliens...

E-infinity 9: "E-infinity communication No. 9 Wyle scaling and deriving the spectral..." in The Beautiful Truth

E-infinity 1-8: "To: Researchers working on El Naschie E-infinity Cantorian-fractal..." in The Beautiful Truth

Steve Dufourny: "Hi John , Interesting.Here is my point of vue . The question is not..." in Free Radical

John Merryman: "Steve, There's no such thing as a wholistic theory. Assuming otherwise is..." in Free Radical


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Ripping Apart Einstein
Cutting the threads of the spacetime fabric and reinstating the "aether" could lead to a theory of quantum gravity.

Readers' Choice: Much Ado About Nothing
Does the vacuum regenerate itself to fill the gaps as spacetime is pulled apart? Could a growing vacuum explain dark energy?

Classic Article: Building a Better Black Hole
FQXi essay contest winner Louis Crane explains how artificial black holes might have controlled our universe’s past and could direct humanity’s future, in this classic article from 2007.

Editor's Choice: Taming Infinity
General relativity and quantum mechanics could be perfectly compatible—as long as you know how to handle infinity, that is.

Readers' Choice: True Lies: Why Mathematics is an Illusion
To find a theory of quantum gravity we may have to look through a different logical lens, abandoning conceptions of "truth" and "falsehood" and crossing over to a new "mathematical universe."


FQXi BLOGS
March 18, 2010

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Is Higgs Competition Healthy? [refresh]
Bookmark and Share

Blogger Graeme Stemp-Morlock wrote on Feb. 19, 2009 @ 19:00 GMT
I’m now back home having spent the last week in Chicago at the AAAS meeting, and I’ve had a chance to catch up on the news reports that came out the meeting. One of the biggest news stories was the race between Fermilab and CERN to find the Higgs. But I can’t help wondering how healthy it is to keep pushing the idea of a race between the two labs?

In September 2008, the whole world watched as the Large Hadron Collider was switched on. None more closely watched than the scientists at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory’s Tevatron synchrotron in Batavia, Il. (Well, except maybe the guys who predicted that the LHC would be shut down by ripples from the future.)

I attended the AAAS news briefing where this “race” between the two accelerators was discussed. Lyn Evans, project manager for CERN and the LHC, compared the electrical fault to the original growing pains that the Hubble Space Telescope had. And, unfortunately, just like with Hubble it will take a significant amount of time to fix the problem, and CERN doesn’t expect to begin normal operations again until mid-September 2009.

To make up for the lost time, the plan is also to operate the LHC all winter long for a complete year–leading some to question the extra $10 million costs involved in running through the colder months. Normally CERN shuts down in the winter.

The LHC’s problems have, of course, bought the world’s second most powerful particle accelerator, Fermilab’s Tevatron, some extra time to hunt for the Higgs. And the Tevatron is going full steam ahead on the hunt.

Dmitri Denisov, a particle physicist at Fermilab, confirmed that they were aggressively hunting for the Higgs particle. In fact, they have already excluded 170GeV as a possible mass range for the Higgs particle. This is the region the Tevatron would be most sensitive to seeing the Higgs particle, but they are going to continue searching that range going up and down in 5 GeV increments.

The challenge with isolating an incident indicative of the Higgs particle is that the Tevatron could only see a handful of events for every collision, and the scientists are having a tough time isolating real events from the background noise. Nonetheless Pier Oddone, at Fermilab, believes that if the Higgs particle is nearby 170 GeV they will have a 90% chance of finding it. (US/LHC blogs and Cosmic Variance have been discussing this too.)

Unfortunately, if the Higgs particle is not in this range, then in a couple years the number of channels added will add so much noise that it will be very tough to find it at all.

I agree that focusing on this race between the labs adds excitement to the hunt for the Higgs. But I worry that it gives people the wrong impression that the Higgs is the only things that matters in particle physics and to the LHC. If the Tevatron doesn’t find the Higgs in the next two years, their chance at the history books will be all used up. And if they do find it, what then for the LHC? Although it’s meant to hunt for evidence of many other things (dark matter, supersymmetry, extra dimensions anyone?), if the LHC is scooped by Fermilab with the Higgs discovery, how big will the backlash from the public be against a hugely expensive particle accelerator, especially in this time of global financial crisis?

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

post approved


Lawrence B. Crowell wrote on Feb. 19, 2009 @ 23:22 GMT
If the tevatron finds the Higgs it might steal some of the initial thunder of the LHC. However, experiments on the Higgs field at much higher LHC energy should determine whether this is a condensate of top/antitop quarks or whether there is technicolor physics. Interestingly this would put the mass at 173GeV/c^2. Of course the search for supersymmetry (twisted or broken SUSY), neutralinos as dark matter and a chance at so called soft black holes in large extra dimensions. The RHIC has data suggestive of this already. So there will be plenty of of physics for the LHC to do.

So before the tevatron become a museum piece or sold for scrap it would be fun if it gave us one last hurrah.

Lawrence B. Crowell

post approved

reply to this thread


Add a New Post
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)







Please enter your e-mail address: