Search FQXi


If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
FQXi FORUM
May 18, 2013

ARTICLE: Testing Times for Nature's Constants [back to article]
Bookmark and Share

paul valletta wrote on Mar. 25, 2010 @ 10:52 GMT
Why is it we cannot observe an Electron, but can assign it a charge value? Rubbing two different structures together creates charge, is it the Electrons pushing out the charge or is it pulling in the charge?

I think the problem lay in frictional charge being more applicable in the distant past Universe, Electrons fighting thier way in and out of compressed matter would aquire certain charge values, in an ever expanding Universe all forms of friction decreases?

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


amrit wrote on Apr. 6, 2010 @ 06:21 GMT
Dear friends,

we can not test time in the universe as universe is timeless. X 4 = i x c x t is spatial too. Galaxies, stars, we human beings and sub-quantum particles move in space only and not in time. Time is run of clocks in timeless universe. There is no physical time behind the run of clocks. We measure with clocks material change i.e. motion of the timeless universe. We experience material change i.e. motion through the inner linear psychological time “part-present-future” that is based on neuronal activity of the brain: we “see” all running in time although we can not perceive time in the universe, we c an perceive only change i.e. motion.

See more on articles attached.

Yours Amrit

attachments: Physical_Time_Is_Run_Of_Clocks__Quantum_Dream.pdf, Observer_is_a_function_of_Fourdimensional_Timeless_Space__for_WEB.pdf

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


dan winter wrote on Apr. 12, 2010 @ 05:41 GMT
If time is defined by the period of rotating charge,

then synchronicity is defined by efficiency

of charge transfer.

Charge transfer efficiency can be shown

to be optimized by golden ratio perfected

fractality, in the form of phase conjugation.

My original Equation evidence at

www.goldenmean.info/coincidence

Planck time - times golden ratio predicts:

hydrogen

solar year

venus year

!

fractality in time..

Summaries at

www.goldenmean.info/selforganization

The experiment:

show that charge transfer between oscillating

capactive circuits increases slightly

when they are place at

golden mean ratio IN TIME!

Significant evidence of the golden mean

ratio at the root TIME

in link 1 above

and at the root of quantum physics

in link 2 above

dan winter

danwinter@fractalfield.com

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


Tim Golden BandTechnology.com wrote on Jul. 22, 2010 @ 00:40 GMT
Isn't 10E-17 good enough precision?

Well, maybe 10E-23 is better, but the first is good enough to me.

In terms of where to seek change in alpha; I'd guess that it will be out of the planetary plane: one satellite did go there, but no anomalies were reported as far as I know. Go North!

- Tim

report post as inappropriate

reply to this thread


Add a New Post
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)



Important: In order to combat spam, please select the letter in this menu between 'J' and 'L':





Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.