Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
FQXi FORUM
May 25, 2012
Sophie,
A most interesting experiment. However, you whetted my appetite and then gave no results gathered to date. I suspect the forces holding the Styrofoam balls together are very much smaller than those holding a Buckyball C60 together and therefore the Styrofoam will not exhibit interference.
See:http://www.zenophysics.com/DWT/13a__Buckyballs.html
Most interesting, Thanks,
Don Limuti
report post as inappropriate
A most interesting experiment. However, you whetted my appetite and then gave no results gathered to date. I suspect the forces holding the Styrofoam balls together are very much smaller than those holding a Buckyball C60 together and therefore the Styrofoam will not exhibit interference.
See:http://www.zenophysics.com/DWT/13a__Buckyballs.html
Most interesting, Thanks,
Don Limuti
report post as inappropriate
Sophie,
The article was a bit vague on the details of the process. For instance, are the balls dropped simaltaneously through the optical grating, or one at a time?
There already is, by the way, a theoretical QM interpretation that explains the "wave/particle" nature of things and *apparent* wave function "collapse", without the need for an actual collapse mechanism or decoherence! It is the DeBroglie/Bohm "pilot wave" type of formalism.
Thanks for the article!
report post as inappropriate
The article was a bit vague on the details of the process. For instance, are the balls dropped simaltaneously through the optical grating, or one at a time?
There already is, by the way, a theoretical QM interpretation that explains the "wave/particle" nature of things and *apparent* wave function "collapse", without the need for an actual collapse mechanism or decoherence! It is the DeBroglie/Bohm "pilot wave" type of formalism.
Thanks for the article!
report post as inappropriate
Lets chat.
https://www.sendthisfile.com/Dsi1UcAS1T4nqej4a0zxk1TB
My
clock converts a circular earth orbit into an eliptical one.
And the result is six minutes difference from sidereal time per year.
Approx we take this figure to 10,000 digits of pi accuracy as the formula uses Pi.
A cicular orbit can be in as many as 11 dimensions but these are unstable when an orbit is converted to an elipse it becomes stable in three dimensions plus one of time.
Thus you can reverse the equation to convert Einsteins 4D space time to 11 dimensions.
So you can convert String theory to Einsteins thoery and EInsteins theory back into string theory.
Some scientists believe Einsteins thoery cannot be expressed in 10 dimensions.
Others believe EInsteins thoery can be expressed in as many dimensions as you want to use...................
What do you believe can my thoery work to unify Einsteins thoery and string theory.
And is my clock time more accurate or just an error of six minutes per year rather than a more accurate measurement of time..........................................
Please help me with this problem.
Steve..................
Iam not answering the question myself what I have provided is background to the problem.
The central question is whether Einsteins 4D space/time can be converted to ten dimensions or not.
report post as inappropriate
https://www.sendthisfile.com/Dsi1UcAS1T4nqej4a0zxk1TB
My
clock converts a circular earth orbit into an eliptical one.
And the result is six minutes difference from sidereal time per year.
Approx we take this figure to 10,000 digits of pi accuracy as the formula uses Pi.
A cicular orbit can be in as many as 11 dimensions but these are unstable when an orbit is converted to an elipse it becomes stable in three dimensions plus one of time.
Thus you can reverse the equation to convert Einsteins 4D space time to 11 dimensions.
So you can convert String theory to Einsteins thoery and EInsteins theory back into string theory.
Some scientists believe Einsteins thoery cannot be expressed in 10 dimensions.
Others believe EInsteins thoery can be expressed in as many dimensions as you want to use...................
What do you believe can my thoery work to unify Einsteins thoery and string theory.
And is my clock time more accurate or just an error of six minutes per year rather than a more accurate measurement of time..........................................
Please help me with this problem.
Steve..................
Iam not answering the question myself what I have provided is background to the problem.
The central question is whether Einsteins 4D space/time can be converted to ten dimensions or not.
report post as inappropriate
Add a New Post