ࡱ>    !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root EntryZ O2@CONTENTS Object 1YnL -`Z`ZContents   !"#$%&(*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPly cost $20. The kids will like it much better than a typewriter. My friend Ralphs kids I mean I might make a gift of it to Hanna if she is a budding writer. You just never know if someone is going to be a writer and you always do. The nonone ever reads my blog I will write a book syndrome. That is what Iam talking about. That is why Iam using a wordprocessor rather than a computer. There is no accounting for taste. And maybe there is an accounting for taste. We has better watch out.! I won $20 last night and actually I won $35 but I lost $15 back. If I have sandwhiches for lunch I will be able to pay my RSL fees. So I can go to the club in the future. I will have enough for busfare and my RSL fees. Fixing the pioneer is a big expense I have to put $59 down. And that is taken off the repair bill. And I have to pay a courier to deliver the parcel. I think I will because the girl said it was up to me. And it is mum would not do it let alone dad. But I can pay whatever it costs to get the Pioneer working again. My theory of the big bang. Four states of matter in one state and four forces one. That means state and forces are one thing. 2 STATE+ 2 FORCE= 4 STATE/FORCE. Now that is an equation really a theory for everything. We should be able to prove that supercritical non newtonian fluid has only two states. And as a result only two forces there we have our equation for the begining of the universe 2+2=4. Maybe 2+2=4 is not such a bad equation for the begining. But what if the maths was always non contradictoCHNKWKS TEXTTEXTFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPPFDPCFDPCFDPCFDPCSTSHSTSHhSTSHSTSHhSYIDSYID^SGP SGP rINK INK vBTEPPLC z@BTECPLC  FONTFONTpEOBJPLC JPSTRSPLC :e ever reads \l "main"| \l "sidebar" BLOG THE BOOK Saturday, February 23, 2008 "http://steve-blogbook.blogspot.com/2008/02/blog-book-1-and-2.html" Todays diary, I called ben Joans computer repair man and made an appointment for the seventh of Feburary. He won't be there that week so his technican will handle the job. I also might get a manual on my Pioneer. I can get it serviced but it is going to cost me $59 upfront. Pussy has been eating mince that is good because we don't ever know what to feed her,but she has been meowing too much. Mum thinks she might be in pain. But I don't think so she is OK. Steve Patrick refunded the $100 I sent him by mistake. Both guys are named Steve. So it is going to take a few days for my paypal refund to clear. Then I can pay Steve Cooper and he should get started on Sensible girl on Thursday. That is if he got his money I don't think he willl start until he gets his hundred dollars. Josh is still working on Branagan and Flanaggan.And I have told him I will pay him in two weeks. I had better be careful as I have to pay for the computer also in two weeks. But Joan sais her repair guy is reasonable. But the question is what does Joan consider reasonable.$ Will it be cheaper than Drews $50. Drew is a great guy but it looks like he will be replaced by another guy. The noone reads my blog I might as well write a book syndrome. That is the name of this dairy. I intend to reminse and talk about the past and the future. How can I talk about the future. The future of my song Back to the Future with the Chevy Ford band. I have asked them to play the songs warming up their instruments. So people will always hear them first before they go on. Rawhide is great for warming up instruments. This machine is really hunky dory.It works 100% and onry. If it is never 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE. Like my book sais.Only Einstein sais the math can be works out as a non contradiction. Is Einstein wrong and Stephen Jeffreys right. That depends on what Stephen Jeffreys really believes. Does he believe that the maths is a non contradiction and that creaation began ex-nihilo. Not out of a phase change from one state of matter to four. That would produce the energy OK but what about the ID.The intelligent design. It is taken for granted. But without it would there be order in a disorderly universe. Can we build a bomb based on supercritical non newtonian fluid.? Since nobel was an exposives manufacturer perhaps he would give me his prize if I could make an explosive producing a plasma from supercritical non newtonian fluid. Then all four forces and four states would be one. But am I right is finding correspondance between state and force. No one is sure they ask thier local scientist. Blacksmith friend. Blacksmith friend Iam not sure you will ever solve time with my Godel time machine. But Godel has a universe which is opposite to our own in which their are closed time loops. Maybe it is opposite in being a non contradiction at the begining. If that is true then the maths works out in A godel universe for the big bang. A unified field theory is a possibility and the opposite is a black hole in a Godel universe. The reverse of this maths should give us the big bang in our universe. This is enough to keep mathematicians busy for centuries. Or at least for five minitues. It should keep them quiet for the scientist babysitters who are minding the mathematicians making sure they are empirical. But the baby sitters haven't done a very good job. My thoery of everything is a universal program. One that is a superomega 2+2=4 is a superomega when it is used to get one equation for everything in a theory of maths. But physics and maths are very similar if you can get one equation for phsyics you can also get one for maths. But omega means you can't or does superomega mean you can. It gets confusing. Wolframs celular automaton means you don't use maths to get the rules for everything. So in a sense it means Omega is right. You have to go beyond maths to make it an experimental science. Really these two things are the same. Dad is really mentally unbalanced he listens to the radio and Tv all day long. And whenever I try to talk he tells me to shut up and listen to the radio. It has just gotten worse and worse over the years. It shows what happens when you let habits get to you... A habit is a force for evil. Good habits are a force for good. Like learning to fix watches.It is just too expensive. And that is the whole trouble there are so many things to buy. It would be good if everything were all on one kit. Easy to use. But it isn't easy and it might not be too hard. Time will tell the future is what we make it. If I could fix watches I could have a big house with a Big plasma TV and a wife to go with it. You can't have a wife unless you can support her. That is what Will Robinson said about Sleeping beauty. I paid Steve Cooper $100 today for Simply Sensible. He said he would talk to Juli about doing the song. They don't have any answers because they are not asking any questions. Like what would an ex-nihilo theory look like. How would it differ from the big bang theory. What if we add billions of years to exnihilo what do we get. Rubbish that is what everyone might say. But I don't think so. Ex-nihilo is a non contradictory begining for the universe the four states of matter are always four and the forces never become one. So the contradiction equation 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is not true. This arguement against the big bang is so strong mathematically. That the only recource of the blaphemer is ad hominum arguements against me. They find scientific arguements ineffective. This is because Einstein wanted a non contradictory theory of everything. And what we have is a contradictory theory of everything where opposite particles X and Y are in the same space and the same time in the same state. The non contradictory thoery of everything would be creation in the Godel universe where the maths that is the reverse of our system could make sense. This is just a begining for a creation ex-nihilo theory of everything. Everything including the expansion of the universe needs to be taken into account. Iam getting my computer fixed next pay as well as paying part payment on two songs. So money is going to be tight. I wonder when I will ever have any money to just have a good time. Steve Cooper has booked Juli for next Friday. He has recorded parts of the song Simply Sensible. Steve Coopers son is in Jumped and Alien Versus Predator 2. And I asked Steve Cooper if the girl from Dr Phil. Could record in his Houston Studios and have pizza with the band. Chevy Ford band. The future is not ours to see. But I figure if I have mercy on someone else that is trying to make it it will water me as well. One favour deserves another. And it is by doing people favours who one day will be successful. That one succeeds yourself. Look at Kevin Rudd I tried to help him get elected. He is now helping the homeless my main thing. But he still refuses to put intelligent design in Australian schools. Maybe the unions won't let him. It really matters to me as much as homelessness. But how much does it matter to Kevin Rudd that creation is taught in schools. One would think it would matter a little to any christian. Except an evolutionist and then he would want reasons to believe curriculum taught in schools. Either way it is the thought that counts remembering God when it comes to what we teach our kids. Next pay my major challenge is to give Stephanie Nickel a deposit of $200 or more for the last stage of our script IN THE SHADOW OF 9/11. It is a good script so far and Iam hoping Steph can finish it without ruining the first 60 pages. It has gone the way that I wanted it to go and it is important to be true to yourself. I would like a pair of crocs shoes. And maybe they will have to wait if I want to pay Stephanie. Unless I pay half the bill for Broadband this pay and the other half next pay. Supercritical non newtonian fluid does that mean 2 STATES+ 2 FORCES= 4 STATE/FORCE. I think it really does although Iam not certain going from that to plasma unifes the four states and four forces. It is the subject of experiment. And experiment can answer all questions. Eddington said don't worry if the observations don't mathc your theory the observations are probably wrong. This is the opposite to the empirical approach to science. Maybe you need a philosophy that can be tested by observations. Maybe if science is not grounded in philosophy it can't work. Was that what Eddington was trying to say. For example there were not observations of an expanding universe in Einsteins time so he modified his theory with the cosmological constant which he later called his greatest blunder. The future is ours to see. And of course it was not Einsteins to see the future.And anyone who makes up a thoery doesn't know whether it will be right. But they should believe in it. And to believe in it it has to add up. It has to be as sensible as 2+2=4. Then you can be certain that it is right. And if it is really really simple then it cannot be wrong. Yet even simple things can be wrong. Simple observations of the way things work can be in error.And observations are never wrong. So If I base a theory on an observation that entropy reverses when ice freezes. then I cannot be wrong when I say entropy reverses for the big bang. But it doesn't. And it has to to explain the order in the universe.My ramblings juts off the top of my head. Are as good as mud. And they might be as clear as mud. But totally interesting anyway. And there is nothing unclear about my ramblings. There is no future for rambling. And there is a great future for blogs of all kinds.And maybe the blog will never replace the book. And it is Blog the book. That is what this book is one big blog. And it is exciting to have my starwriter on my desk. Because writing is a slow process. And if I leave it in the lounge room I will have a book in no time. One that isn't very good.And one that is just fine. So what kind of a book will it be now. A book about everything. About totally anything I find interesting. And the starwriter makes a great gift for me. Because I can see what Iam writing. And it is better than a computer. It is great for writing my blog. And what do I want to winge about. If you are writing a blog you must want to winge about something. And I do I want to winge about why it is so. Because there is nothing worse than winging. And asking why the problem exists in the first place. is the first step towartds solving it. So why do indentical particles X and Y exist in the SAME PLACE at the SAME STATE at the SAME TIME. I would say that they don't. If I didn't believe the big bang. And the big bang means 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is TRUE. And if it is true identical particles can occupy the SAME SPACE. Why is it so.? And that is our problem why does this equation mean something which cannot be true. The answer is it does mean two opposites can be one. But it also means identical particles can be made one. And maybe both are true. But to add identical particles you have to split them in 1/3s. And maybe you only have to take a third of a particle matematically. And this is really interesting.A third of a particle mathematically is a third of a particle. It will behave just as if you had split the particle three ways. So there is nothing to stop us putting three identical particles togther on paper. And that is a solution to fusion. If we could do it in reality and not just on paper. Then we could take three hydrogens and get one hydrogen. Hydrogen three. And that isn't it it is a new particle of hydrogen based on three divided particles. And maybe it is the answer. But will never know if we don't ask the question why is it so.? Why would three particles becoming one. Generate power. It is a answer to a prayer. Because it might be an answer to a hope. That one can be three. Because splitting one into three is what three thirds are all about. But three into one is exactly the same process. And it really is not. It is putting humpty back togther again. And if a third of a particle can exist at all. Then it can be joined to another two thirds of a particle. So we take the particle apart and then we put it back togther again. And that is humpty dumpty. And it is a sound theory. But putting particles togther in the same place at the same time when they are identical. Is plausible. If we are dealing with forces on a par with the big bang. Then paricles may disintegrate and reunite all the time. What is my purpose noting les than nuclear oblivian.And of course I ahve higher hopes than that for a world on the brink of war. And it is insane to have high hopes.Ad it might not be insane to believe that eventually war will be over. And that nuclear power will replace ordinary power. And that is exactly what happened. So it could happen again. After using the power that is given in anger. It may never be used again not in anger but in peace. And everything has it downside.It is the slipppery slope. And sometimes allowing something does not mean the slippery slope. Sometimes things get better and not worse. And that is the opposite to Murphys law. And we cannot live our lives by Murphys law or we would always be afraid. That is what the law on non contradiction causes in me. Fear of what it means to have exceptions. But there have always been exceptions. and there always will be one exception that is the big bang. It can never be worked out as Einstein said that it could be with on contraiction mathematics. It takes a new kind of math QUANTUM STRANGENESS. To work out the big bang. If time can travel backwards and entropy be reversed then the big bang can make sense. If four states of matter being one means four forces are also one. The energy can be released on a grand scale. Four particles A B X Y can be four states of identical particles. and they can be one STATE and the four particles can be in the SAME POSITION at the SAME TIME. And this is the key to unlimited energy. And you don't have to believe me ADOPT A PHYSIST. That is what Iam doing. And he will tell me to go back to the drawing board. But in trying to prove me wrong he will prove me right. And I will have plenty to talk about. Because adopting a physics professor for collaboration was the best move ever. There is no answer to how much I have to want to be free. Because if I believe writing is a curse. Then I have to want to be free. And everyone believes writing is no curse. But what about a blessing I have yet to see any blessing from my writing. And it is obvious that it is no blessing. Because it is plain that the fruit is bad. And yet I continue to make a blog. Because I hope in vain for something to happen. That is positive. And everything seems to be negative. And all things come to those who wait. One day I will be happy that I kept writing. Because I could be afraid of all the possibilities. Like a poisoned pie. You can't believe God would make a poisoned pie. And I do not believe that. And the truth is I do believe God is the author of a poisoned pie. Because everything I believe affects me.And believing God is the author of a pie that is poisoned. Really makes it hard for God to reach me. And it isn't the case.That it is hard for God to reach me. And it really is true that He is trying hard. To get me to believe the pie is not poison. Because if anyone can eat the pie and not be hurt. Then it is not poison. But of course I explain the way of 666. And I explain how to believe otherwise. And of course I make it very difficult to believe otherwise. But that is because it is difficult to prove 666 wrong. With mathematics. Because it is easy to prove it wrong with logic. And that is what I will do right now. I will prove 666 wrong with logic. It is logical to do the opposite of what Jesus sais. If Jesus sais 12+12=24 is right then 21+21=42 must be right. And that is the logic of the blaphemers. They simply have to choose 42 as there answer rather than six fours. If Jesus had said 42 was the answer they would choose 24. And it is obvious that Jesus did not say anything.And of course it is all in my mind.And I may have darkenes instead of light. That is the whole question have I blasphemed the Holy Spirit by talking about why Einstein is wrong. And I might have done that if Einstein was God. And of course he is not. So I can prove him wrong without proving God wrong. And maybe I can't prove Einstein wrong without proving God wrong. Then If Iam really proving God wrong in my book Einstein Proved Wrong. Then it is a poisoned pie. But if the purpose is to prove God right. Then the pie is not poisoned. And I don't know if my purpose is to prove God right or the law of non contradiction wrong. And that is just it if it is my purpose to prove non contradiction wrong. Then Iam proving all truth wrong. And If I argue the big bang contradicts the law of non contradiction. Then I doing God a big favour. And I might think so.But God doesn't need any favours. And He would love one. He would love it if I decided that ex-nihilo creation means matter was never in the same state at the same time in the same place. That opposite particles cannot be in the same state and place at the same time. And this would really rot your socks if you were with reasons to believe. Because the big bang is mathematically impossible. Unless we allow the creation equation. And it is 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE. And it is a contradiction according to my enemies. But if they are right it proves the big bang wrong. Because that is a good purpose for a creation equation. But if the big bang is right. Then a whole new branch of contradictory math must be created to allow identical particles to exist in the same state at the same time in teh same place. And that would not prove the big bang right. It would mean it is not part of the set of truth. IT would mean it is a lie. And that is close to the truth. Because the thoery that everything was once one. Cannot be true if the law of non contradiction always holds. The reason why the pie may be poison. Is many good christians believe both the law of non contradiction and the big bang. And if one is not true then the other will still be true. And sadly they will choose to believe non contradiction does not always apply. That makes my computer program poison. Because it attempts to unify everything with my equation and 2+2=4. And maybe 2+2=4 is the real saver. Becasue the four forces can be four. And they can if they are two forces plus two forces. And that is what Iam explaining with non contradiction. Because if forces are two they are not contradictory. They are only contradictory when they are one. Everything cannot be one they way God is one. And if the equation attempts to make creation the same as the creator. Then it is a pot of poison. But it is not clear in my book that the creation equation is a means of proving creation cannot be a big bang. If the big bang is 2+2=4 then it can still have occured. Only in this way can the law of non contradiction be right. But what if 2+2=4 is not adequate. WHat if you can't explain the equations by adding them 2+2=4. Because if the unviverse was once 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4 FORCE/STATE. Then all equations should add up 2+2=4. And Einsetins equatin doesn't. Even though I have tried hard to prove why it can be 2+2=4. Scientists would say it is fundamentally not a 2+2=4 equation. And that is just it if I can come up with a theory of everything that is 2+2=4. The Hawking is a cosmic con artist. And it does not follow from the conclusion. And it really does follow. Hawking believes you can prove anything with math. And it will still be right. But that is seperating the real world from the math. And I can prove everything with the math. I can prove Einsteins unified field theory. At least in my delusions of grandeur I can prove it. But I have never looked at the math of Godel. Yet I claim his theory begins with a non contradictory big bang. And leads to a contradictory black hole. And this as good as what Hawking does. And of course he checks the math first. BUt I have come with the idea so Hawking can check the math. If the the big bang is non contradictory in another universe. That means it is contradictory in ours. And maybe that is a recipie for disaster. But time will not go backward in our universe. And it will at the begining. That is a new theory that Godel is right for the begining of our unviverse. And it sounds good and it was right off the top of my head. Because it is good enough to loose my head. Because the math can be understood to prove the big bang wrong. Because the above should be true if the big bang is a contradiction. But if the opposite of a black hole in a Godel universe is non contradiction maths. Then that math should prove the big bang right. But if it does not then it may prove exnihilo. But exnihilo has never been combined with an old universe. And if it were combined it would prove science right. And religion right. It would prove both wrong.And of course we don't know what it woud prove. But maybe we would be better off with a big bang. Than ex-nihilo that argues evolution is right. It is hard to argue evolution is wrong if the earth is old. And that isn't true. And it might not be the premise that everything exists without cause. Is a premise that is inadeqaute. It is a God of inadequacy. When evolution is put togther with ID. Both are an adequate cause. And they may be if ex-nihilo creation were combined with an old earth. But that would an an inadequate explaination of the origin of the earth. And only if everything had to be created all at once. Maybe seven days means it took time for creation to take place. And that is happened according to the laws of physics chemistry and biology. With a helping hand from ID. Id is an excellent helping hand for evolution. Without ID evolution cannot explain anything. But with ID evolution can explain everything. And that could be a suspect pie. Because we are saying God lied about the creation of the universe. And of course we are not saying that we are saying Lord help us to explain how you created everything. Without saying you did it by chance. And that is the pie of ill repute. My universal program which gives rise to space and time. Maybe it is terrific. To be able to prove order within randomness. or maybe it is just a way of arguing there is no God. There has to be order within randomness so mankind will have a choce whether to have faith or not. Philosophy and creation science can never approach God. And they cannot reach God without faith. That is the four spiritual laws. And If I were lost I would love them. But because Iam found I don't regard them highly. And it is the opposite if I were lost I would not regard the four spiritual laws highly. They are too simple an explaination for life the universe and everything. And Jesus explaination is 3*4. Three laws about four spiritual laws. And they are MAKE NO GRAVEN IMAGE.Because God can be random. He can be an image that is random. And God is never happy with graven images. Graven images can be mathematical equations for God. And that is exactly it making God one with everything is a graven image. And God is one with everything. And only for the Buddhists. Every single thing on earth is distinct and in kinds. And there are kinds of all phenomonon. And that includes things like states and forces. They are never one but always kinds. That means everything has never be one. Everything has always been at least four states and four kinds of forces. That is the four laws for cosmology. The fact that there are four laws for the universe. Means there are four laws for everything. And that might be 12 because there are three laws. Of four. And that is the total of all knowledge. To understand what it means that three times four is equal to 12. And maybe it just like 42. Just an answer you give when you don't know. But God does know. So the answer he gives is not a contradiction. And three fours is not contradictory any more than two sixs. 2+2=4 is equal to 12+12=24. And that is the basis of the early univese. It is simply not what they say it is. And there equations are no better than 42. Because that is actually the answer they are giving. But am I trusting someone I love. I believe so. Someone I love would not poison me. And If Iam poisoned by someone I love. Then it my fault for trusting a little bit too much. You can find the answers in my next book. And I hope so that the starwriter will get many years of use. Because it is an excellent tool for writing the truth. And if I told lies I would say it is perfect. But it is just a machine that makes it easy to write. And you just would never get around to writing as much as you will write on this machine. The equation for acceleration is intitial speed- final speed/time. And it is 2. Because then you can add Speed= Distance/time. If you make that two as well. And then you have an equation for the speed of deceleration. And exactly what is the speed of the deceleration of light in the mirror chamber. If is faster than C. And it may faster than any speed. Because light declerates very fast. The speed of decleration is not as fast as the speed of the acceleration of light. And it may be very fast but not quite as fast as that. Light takes 0 time to acclerate. And that cannot be true since it proves absolute time. So it must take a little time to accelerate. And we can measure extremely small times. And maybe we can't measure how small the time is for light to accelerate. But we can measure the decleration of light.And estimate how fast it accelerates. But all of this doesn't make sense because I have added two equations 2+2=4. And acceleration and speed are two different things. But if they are the same. Then what is speed.? It is something similar to accleration but not quite the same thing. What will happen if we add 1/3 ACCELERATION+ 1/3 SPEED+ 1/3 SPEED= 1 ACCELERATION SPEED. And that will make everything right. Making two things one. And totally everything is wrong when speed and acceleration are the same thing. Because Einsetins theory not longer applies to speed and acceleration togther. We have a new theory that is what we will say. Because we will say the speed of decleration is greater than C. And then E=MCsquared not longer applies to gravity waves.Because the speed of accleration of gravity waves is greater than the speed of light.And maybe this makes no sense maybe it still means gravity has to travel at C. Then Einstien isn't wrong. But maybe Einstein needs a better theory. So he has one. If Iam Einstein then I have a better theory the speed of acceleration of light is always going to be greater than the speed of light. So acceleration is greater than speed. And that is a terrific law. Only accleration can never be expressed as speed. And of course light travels a distance the size of the universe when it reflected to infinity. So time is expressed in light years. And this is divided by the speed of light. To get acceleration. And a similar rule will give us decleration. But when we add the equations 2+2=4. We get speed of decleration. And that means information travels at a speed when it transmitted on declerating light. And the speed is greater than C. And if they would only listen they would have a new operating system for windows. Where information travelled at a maximum speed of infinity. And speed means Boyles law is obsolete. But the law of too much information means that will never build the new operating system. And that is a shame so information revolution means information overload. They simply can't keep advancing the speed of information. Because of C. Unless they can make speed and decleration of light one. They can never beat Boyles law. And you are reading it and you think you understand why Iam wrong.So email me at aircloud@bigpond.net.au And tell me why information can never travel faster than light. It may be that you are right. That information cannot be transmitted on declerating light beams. Or accelerating. If that is so information must always be limited to C. So boyles law must always apply. If you have enjoyed adding newtons laws for speed and acceleration. Then you will love adding Einsteins equations for speed and accleration. Does Einstein approach an explaination of information sent at faster than the speed of light.? And his equations for speed and acceleration added 2+2=4. Or in 1/3s. Will give an answer to the problem of time. Does information travel faster than light without going back in time.? At the quantum level it does go back in time. But information is more than quantum. It is classical and maybe in classical theory information cannot go faster than light. We will succeed where others have failed. This is always the way to fail because others have failed to prove Einstein wrong for a reason. And the reason is information cannot travel faster than light. But let us suspend disbelief for a moment what If information can travel faster than light. The the speed of the deceleration of information is faster than light. How do I prove Jeffreys wrong. By measurement it is not an experiment unless you do your own measurement. You have to measure the speed of decleration in the mirror chamber with 2+2=4. And you find the answer is a bit like adding 2 FORCE+ 2 STATE= 4 FORCE/STATE. Maybe the equations are interchangeable. And of course they are goobledegook. But the idea of 2+2=4 is the most basic of ideas it is not goobledegook. It means two ideas can be combined without contradiction. But we could add 1/3 SPEED C+ 1/3 DECELEATION C+ 1/3 DECELERATION C= 1 SPEED/DECLERATION. No one can measure the decleration of light in the mirros chamber. And anyone can it takes a bright mind to do so and some very powerful computers. And it only takes a five year old with matlab.... So maybe the speed of decleration of light has not been measured because scientists have not bothered to measure it. I keep saying hey measure it. But they say no they won't. It is a bit like Bruce Almighty they have free will... So if they ever choose to believe my book they might measure the speed of the decleration of light. And see if they can measure information travelling faster than light. In a round about way I have described why EInstein would be wrong if he was wrong but have only proved him right. The distance travelled by light when it is reflected ot infinity approaches zero brilliance at infinity. But never reaches it. If light were to reach zero. The explansion of the universe would be at the speed of light. This proves Einsetin is right. Because the expansion of the universe can never exceed the speed of light. However the universe can be accelerating faster than C. And what affect would this have on the zero value for the distance light travels.? Superheated supercritical non newtonian fluid. And it is another state. And it really might be another state to be boiling. But it is even more of a new state. But it is not quite plasma. If it were possible to change a supercritical non newtonian fluid to plasma. It would be four states in one. And it would in theory. But perhaps supercritical non newtonian fluid cannot exist as a plasma. But if we can imagine that it can. Then we have four forces unified. And that is the thoery that unifiying the four forces is simply a matter of unifying the four states. And if they are totally indendant then you have to unify the four forces some other way. And they don't have to be unified.And they do for Einstein to be right. That is why we should try to unify them by unifying the four states. Four forces can be two forces when matter is two states. If this is true it simplifys the idea. There is a direct relationship between forces and the states of matter. Even if there is no direct relationship four forces must be one in the big bang. And they must be two. That is 2 FORCES+ 2 STATES= 4 FORCE/STATES. And it is probably true that making four one. Is possible but not in the universe. Creation exnihilo is the alternative of 2+2=4. and that is possible that it really could be the big bang. But if the big bang were not one force and were two. It would be different. And the ultimate particle for 2+2=4 is the photon not the gluon. Since photons can be in the same state and place at the same time. So thye ultimate particle we are looking for is not solid light. It is light in a state between states. And if atoms are made up of solid photons. Then that is solid light. And maybe everything begins with photons. And that is a wild guess. But like one of spocks guesses it is better than some peoples calculations. And we can test it in the accelerator. And we most certainly can try to find out if atoms are ultimately made up of photons. I like it because it is my thoery. That is what a six year old would say. I have to say I like it because it fits the data. It fits the data from Genesis. Maybe photons are the binding force of the atoms. And that should be easy to test. But sometimes like with strings the ultimate particle cannot be detected with instruments. But a photon rather than a string would be a totally different theory. Matter must be photon like in the big bang. And that is totally true. Matter must behave like photons in a stateless way.A maybe a photon could vibrate at a frequency. There I have unified string theory and photon theory for the first time. If we could imagine a string of light. Maybe we would be cooking with plutonium. And I just don't have the answers. I could say that or I could speculate. You might as well have two bob each way. And that is what a lot of people do. But I choose a rough horse and put the house on. That is what Hawking sais to do. And that is the way he plays science. He bets on improbability. But it is a good bet the universe is probably stanger than we imagine it to be. E=Mcsquared= 2 H+ 2 H + E= 4 H+E And H is mass the mass of two hyrdgogen atoms. And mass is equal to atomic weight for hydrogen. And dont quote me. Because it is true Iam certain. E=mc squared= 2 M+ 2M+ E= 4 M+E. And this is the test of Einsteins equation can you make E=MCsquared equal to 2+2=4. If both equations are equal then fission is equal to fusion. That means the matter that is lost in fission is equal to energy produced. And the amount of matter gained in fusion is equal to the energy. If they can be equal then Einsetin is right. Matter can be equal to energy and not just mass. The equations do not equal. Is what you might say. You might say E=MCsquared can never be expressed as 2+2=4 because C cannot be 2. And if fission can never equal fusion for energy produced and more is produced by fusion. The Einstein is wrong about equivalence. There are two transformations of matter to energy and they are both not equal to each other. And that is just balderdash. And maybe it really isn't because maybe energy and mass are not equal to energy and mass. And that is rubbish. But the possibility that a new energy can be derived from four states of matter being one. And foru forces being one. May mean the fusion and fission are two different things. And of course they are a hydrogen bomb is not a putonium bomb. And they are both plutonium bombs. But it depends on how you phrase a question to the answer that you get. And I will bet they will prove Einstein right. That 2+2=4 can be E=MCsquared. And that fisson and fusion can be one. That is it I really don't have anything else to talk about. And I have decleration. And I have explained that fully. And decleration is newtons equation. For acceleration reversed. And it might not even be the same equation. But if we add Newtons equation for decleration to Newtons equation for speed. We get the speed of decleration. And it is equal to Pi squared multiplied 186,000 m/s squared. And there is no reason that instantaenous doesn't take a little time. Pi squared multiplied by 186,000 squared is the fastest speed we can imagine. And it maybe the limit for deceleration. Nothing can decelerate faster than light. And light can. Light can declerate faster than light. So what is the point. We can transmit information on declerating light. And maybe we cannot use declerating light for information. But if we can the speed of the information will be faster than C. And we be travelling between two mirrors an infinite distance. The distance is virtual. And it is more than that it is a physical distance measured by the loss of energy of light. And maybe it is a simulator for the real world where light travels a finite distance. But you can't round off infinity. And you really can make finity rational. Because infinity is always rational.And it never is. That is the whole point. If an infinite distance is a rational distance time is absolute. And if time is absolute anything can travel faster than light. And only information can. And of course I have talked about all this before. So I must be finished. And there always comes a point where the work is finished. And maybe I want to finish with four forces thatare one and four states that are one. That is a good place to finish. Because you have you choice of believing the big bang or exnihilo. And it on the basis of the test for truth. And if the test for truth is wrong then the big bang is right. But if the test for truth is not wrong that it happened differenty to what they say. We can say that it must be non contradictory to be a sound theory. And that is all we can say since ex-nihilo is not really a theory. If it were a theory we could compare it to the big bang and find one right and the other wrong. But maybe they are both right and the big bang mathematics must be non contradictory. Then 2+2=4 must be right for forces and states. Because that is non contradictory. But 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE is something the scientists do not agree about. If it is the equation for the big bang. Then it fails the truth test. And if it is the equation for ex-nihilo then it doesn't fail the truth test because something out of nothing is a contradiction. In terms. And that is what the contradiction is all about it is acontradcition of terms. Terms like space time and state and place. Particles can exist in the same place even if they are identical. And they cannot exist in the same time and state. And I have said this before but it has become the total sum of all knowledge. And it might be just that I might know myself that I will choose something else if God sais 2+2=4. SO if the truth proves 2+2=4. I would choose to believe the other equation. But the truth sais the other equation is right and not 2+2=4. And maybe that is a lie. Because arguing against 2+2=4 isn't logical. And that is the whole point of my books. You can have a 2+2=4 theory of everything. One that does add up. But you cannot have a contradictory theory of everything. And of course you can. People disagree about whether the law of non contradiction is true. And they will always disagree. But I should agree that the evidence is in favour of the law. And I have not looked at the evidence. And that is what I must do. Before deciding the big bang is false. I must be sure the law always holds in every circumstance. That there are no exceptions. And there ar eno laws like that. Even gravity can have an exception. SO the big bang is an exception to a law that holds true otherwise. That is if this equation is right 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 ORANGE+ 1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE. The non contradictory equation is 2 APPLE+ 2 ORANGE= 4 APPLE/ORANGE. This could work for the big bang or ex-nihilo. The maths is simple non contradiction maths. So the theory has to agree with this law to be valid. And no one will agree with that. The hope that I have is that everyone will enjoy what I have done.And that is because I have saved the starwriter one more time. So I can finish what I have started. And make a dos file. Because this starwriter can make a dos disc that can save dos files. And then I can open them. And maybe I can open them with XP. Then I can put them on a blog. And everyone will say what a great blog. And nobody ever sais that. A blog is a blog that is my philosophy. And it is not very good because there are blogs and there are blogs. And it is a great blog. That is my conclusion and now I will make the dos file. The total sum of all knowledge. Is 2+2=4. And that wouldn't make sense. Except that if everything is intelligently designed. The creator had a simple answer for all things. And it wasn't that 1/3+1/3+1/3=1. Because that is a simple answer for the creator. He is three in one but his creation is 2+2=4. Because of the law of non contradiction. There is no contradicton between adding two apples to two oranges to get 4 APPLE/ORANGE. Because there are two of each. And they are not combined in the one place. But the 1/3 equation is meant to be the alterntive. Everything is one. All equations regardless of what theory they may be from add up to one. And all equations must add up to two. And they do all equations can be added in twos. But to add them in ones is to contradict the law of non contradiction. And this was something that Einstein didn't know. He thought four forces could be one and four states four. He thought non-contradiction maths was the answer to the theory of everything. So Einstein may not have agreed with the big bang. And he most certainly would have as it where his equation leads. But if it were it leads is it right. If we make E=MCsquared 2+2=4 is it then non-contradiction. And in a way it is contradictory to make C 2. But there are ways around that. Communication mathematical ideas is always the problem. Mathematicians find it hard to communicate. As they have to use an analogy to explain the math.And then all you know is the analogy you don't know the math. And when I explain the law of non contradiction in terms of particle physics. I don't know the math. I only know that two sets of equations can be one. And even three sets of completely different equations can be one. And this abandonment of the principals of math. In order to learn something about creation. And it doesn't make sense to completley rewrite maths for the big bang. And in fact it makes perfect sense as the laws of the universe do not hold during the big bang. So before the big bang there was another equation for momentum and energy. And it is simple to derive an equation from four states. But I have no idea how to do it. But if you can dervive and equation from four states then when those four are one. You can derive a new equation. And that will mean momentum was different in the begining. So I have nothing to add. And I really have finished my thoery of everything. And if that is the case then the starwriter won't make any difference. It is a great writing tool. But I can use a computer just as well. And of course I can use a typewriter. And that is what the starwriter is a typewriter. That is how I started to write Einstein Proved Wrong. And at the time I didn't know why Einsetin was wrong. He is wrong to think you can make up a non contradictory theory where the four forces and the four states of matter are one. Because X and Y cannot be in the SAME PLACE at the SAME TIME in the SAME STATE. That means you can't add Einstein Bose to Dirac Fermi with the 1/3 equation. And my opponents say opposite particles cannot be in the same place. And they say identical particles cannot be in the same place. And maybe they are right. Maybe the third equation is really proof Einstein is wrong. But I have come to believe Einstein is right. What then. Then Einsteins equation cannot be non contradictory that is it fails the test of maths that is 2+2=4. The reason is because everything began in a big bang. But Einstein is right is what I say. Then I must believe there is a cause other than creation. The universe must evolve. And Roger Penrose believes there are previous incarnations of this universe. But he doesn't yet understand that a big crunch means four states and four forces becoming one. And then exploding to form four forces and four states again. So this a perfect forumulation of Einsteins theory. That is because it is testable. And the idea that Einsteins equation violates the law of non contradiction is testable too. But people will go for the idea of a mechanism. And a mechanism means energy is niether created or destroyed. If there is a cycle energy is not lost. And that might be the alterntive to the idea that the big bangs must stop one day. If energy cannot leave a universe then it merely changes form. And all f the matter and energy of the previous universe must have come from somewhere. So we must suppose that the first big bang was ex-nihilo. And that is logic evolution doesn't explain how the universe got here. And there is no solution energy and matter must have been created from nothing. And that in itself is a contradiction. So perhaps Einstein isn't wrong and a contradiction makes sense when we are talking about something from nothing. We will never understand the rules of the big bang. That is because we can never repeat it. It is far too big a thing to be simulated in a lab. You can't put the big bang under the microscrope. And that is exactly what I have suggested that there is a way of looking back in time. But If Iam wrong and my mirror chamber is just two mirrors. Then the big bang is in the past. And we can never be certain of what is in the past. We can be sure that it is different to what happens in the present. Or we can assume that the present is the key to the past. Then we should not be too quick to throw out the law of non contradiction as it applies in the present it could have applied all the time before the big bang. But we are not advocating uniformitarianism and in a way that is creation science. Because the big bang may have been a catastrophy. And that is logical science. If Iam going to keep writing I will hve to find something to write about. Otherwise I might as well give the starwriter way. And it is such an excellent piece of technology. But loving inanimate objects doesn't make sense. But I love my starwriter and don't want to take it to the tip. But it ten years it will be 20 years old. And will it still work. Maybe If I get it serviced it might work for nother 30 years. Only it doesn't need to be serviced right now as it has never been used. But when the screen dies on me and it might never because it is LCD and that kind of screen doesn't die. So I could write my diary and that is exactly right. I will write about what is happening today. Mum is trying to get me to take a blood test for postrate cancer. Just because my whiddle is little. And I don't want even bother the doctor. Matte of fact I don't want to take blood tests I can test myself at home. But the doctor won't let me. And I can insist and it always good policy not to insist with a doctor. When he can have you committed. And of course he can't if Iam really OK. But who is to say If Iam OK. There is always someone who will say I'm not. And that why the law should be changed. About putting people away. There is always somebody who doesn't like you. And if you have been to hospital before they can cause trouble. But God keeps things from going too far. And He always does because everything would be too much if it wasn't for God. And I don't know If I have anything else to share. My song Tin soldiers worked out really well. It sounds good enough for radio. It isn't pretending to fit the words exactly. It is more like a poem about war. And it is beautiful in it's own way. And that what all my songs are they are things I found beautiful. And maybe they are copied. And some of the tunes are. But maybe most of them are my own words. Nobody else could make up such crazy lyrics. And nobody will be jealous of my LP record. Because I never thought I would have my own LP. And be offering it to Sony. WHat if Sony said yes then I would be the famous songwriter Stephen A Jeffrey. And if I keep working my songs will speak for themselves. I won't to say buy my LP. Because they will already have it. There is no future in songwriting. And there might not be any future in not songwriting. Because to succeed you have to try really hard. Because there are others trying just as hard. And they are succeeding. And they are not. So If you are given success you should work very hard. As somebody else wants what you have. And it is only a little. But for certain there is somebody who is jealous. And that is the devil. He wants what you have. But you don't have to give it to him. You can hang on to what you have. And even get more. Because to he who has more will be given.The pope has come up with a new list of seven deadly sins. I would put unbelief first then doubting then wavering then doublemindness then changing your mind( a womans sin). So it's fun. But there are many words for unbelief and all of them are deadly. And the pope isn't concerned about unbelief. And he might concerned about faith in the catholic church. But faith in your church when it contradicts faith in the bible is not faith at all. And it is still faith but misguided. And faith can still be powerful even when misguided. That is hwy my faith to ridiclue myself with different titles. Might still be powerful but misguided. Liek Jekel and Hyde that really isn't who Iam in Christ. But it is who the enemy is. And an evil spirit takes a hold of a man then he is hyde and he will do anything. The next moment he is jeckel and he is sorry. That is what the last days is like. People are sorry for what they have done. Seven deadly sins. Lorenz is not Einstein and he is. Just as smart as Einstein. So what if put 1/3 Lorenz equation+ 1/3 Einsetin+ 1/3 Einstein= 1 Einstein/Lorenz. and this equation is infinite. And you can round it off to one.But you don't have to it can be an equation for the big bang. And I don't know what Lorenz has to say but I know any equation can be added 2+2=4. Iam not so sure about in thirds since this depends on the law of non contradiction being wrong about the big bang. 1/3 APPLE+ 1/3 APPLE+1/3 APPLE= 1 APPLE. But people will disagree on what an apple is. The same kind of equation but no equation is really the same kind. They are all different kinds. And if you can any equations then you can add Einstein and Lorenz. And Steven will do just that. But he won't win the nobel prize because he has set out to prove Einstein wrong. And that will always be unpopular. And it might fassion in the future to prove Einstein wrong. It is likely it will never be in fassion. But people question authority in the last days. And they question everything except science. Because science should be one of the seven deadly sins. And science falsely so called is one of the seven deadly sins. Add everything including the kitchen sink. That means add all the equations for principai mathematica by whitehead. And you will come with a unified theory of mathematics. And there is not suppposed to be one. But the quantum strangeness equation or the third equation or the creation equation 1/3 APPLE+1/3 ORANGE+1/3 ORANGE= 1 APPLE/ORANGE. Means you can put different equations togther as one. You can put millions of different equations together and get one. So there is nothing you can't get an equation for. If you add the right two things you can an equation for anything in particular or everything in general. But it doesn't work you say. And it has to work for any equation. If it has to work does that mean it is right. Just because everything is one equation doesn't mean the equation is right. Becaue two could be right. Then things are different are not one. They are two. And you can have one equation of 2+2=4. And this simply non contradiction. Wheras one equation for everything is contradictory. So you might say one equation for everything has limited use. And Einstein thought one equation would be the answer to electromagnetism and gravity. He had not known about the strong or weak nuclear forces. And whether they should be included in the four forces is something for others to consider. I will add them to get four and then divide by four to get one equation. And that equation will be 100% right. Because it will be an equation for four forces that are one. And it will not be contradictory. And that is just it one equation for two is contradictory. So it will only work in the big bang. And that is of course the equation we want. But an equation that works in the present universe. Is one based on two forces. That is supercritical non newtonian fluids have two states. So they should have two forces as well. But perhaps they don't except in the big bang. When two forces would be one and two states would be one. But an experiment with supercritical non newtonian fluids may not prove that energy is stored. But it is fact stored when four states become one. Maybe it is stored as one force. And when one state becomes four. The energy is released. A previous incarnation of our universe ends in a big crunch. Four forces become one and four states of matter become one. And when four states become one the energy of the universe is stored. And it released when one state becomes four in the big bang. And there is no better theory. That ex-nihilo. Because no matter how many universes there have been the first one must have come from nothing. SO itis just procrastination backward in time. To keep from making a decision of a supernatural cause. Since science cannnot explain energy and matter from nothing. It goes against the laws of thermodynamics. So science will be happy to have another explaination. That means Iam the devil. And Iam not the devil because Iam teaching the controvery and that is what a good teacher does. My experiment with truth has got two answers. One is evolution and one is creation. And they both have equal footing except one has the bible backing it in. The big bang is a contradiction would God have made the universe contrary to his own law of non contradiction. If he did he was trying to prove a point about what truth is.? Because he may have done just that. Started the universe with another contrary universe. Because the other universe is a Godel one. And this satisifes science perfectly. As they imagine a Godel universe to be perfect. But it is a dream of an imagination that is Holy. And it might be an unholy dream. But whatever kind of dream a Godel universe is it is not meant to be taken as the start for our universe. And if it is to be the begining. Then it proves everything about how science makes decisions. It is a matter of convienience. It is convienent to say the big bang balances like an equation. If it does not balance on the side of energy then it is ex- nihilo. Then the energy came from outside our universe. And that is simple ex-nihilo explaination. The energy equation does not balance. And when it balances the figures are wrong for the Godel universe and our universe. The figures have to be wrong if the equation does not balance. And that is just common sense and equation that does not balance is wrong. And one that does balance when it is not correct is just as wrong. But the appearance is that is must balance. And it very satisfying to the human mind for the equation of the big bang to balance with the energy of a previous universe. And the mass exactly. So the mind will make it happen. Even though creation science computers will prove it wrong. And maybe a scenario where everybody accepts my thoery is unrealistic. But that is the kind of world it would be dividided over creation. Because the more creation science tried to prove that the energy equation for the universe doesn't balance. The more evolution would try and prove that it does balance. And maybe tht would not be satisfactory. So maybe it is better that they think Iam a lunatic. And they might always believe the opposite. Because I have taught the controversy and that is what every good christian teacher does. Or should do. Because one side always sounds right until you hear the other. You have to understand why people believe as they do. They choose not to believe the truth. And it out of convienience. Everything balances makes perfect sense. But it isn't what the bible sais. Everything doesn't balance is what the bible sais. And you can prove it right by mathematics simple or complex. With a PC and matlab you don't even need a supercomputer. And IBM 486 will be just fine. And somebody will program an IBM 486 to add equations and it will be a supercomputer. Because it will be super. And I must have unrealistic expectations. And I do expect a lot to happen. But not anything postive. Because Iam expecting more ridicule. And that is what anyone gets who makes progress. This plilgrim has made progress. Towards a theory of everything. And there is no theory. And there really is now a proper theory about how it took place. One that can be tested by mathematicians.Anhd not just by computers but also in the lab. With supercritical non newtonian fluids. And they are not the answer to everything. And they really might be the answer to saving the world. If we build a bomb and that won't save the world. But a super efficent battery that works in cars will save the world. And eveready have lived up to their name and they are making the battery right now. Posted by STEVE at "http://steve-blogbook.blogspot.com/2008/02/blog-book-1-and-2.html" "http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7614472316881962967&postID=2056440126127556867" "http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7614472316881962967&postID=2056440126127556867""http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=7614472316881962967&postID=2056440126127556867" Subscribe to: "http://steve-blogbook.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" Blog Archive "http://steve-blogbook.blogspot.com/?widgetType=BlogArchive&widgetId=BlogArchive1&action=toggle&dir=close&toggle=YEARLY-1199174400000&toggleopen=MONTHLY-1201852800000""http://steve-blogbook.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=1" (1) "http://steve-blogbook.blogspot.com/?widgetType=BlogArchive&widgetId=BlogArchive1&action=toggle&dir=close&toggle=MONTHLY-1201852800000&toggleopen=MONTHLY-1201852800000""http://steve-blogbook.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html" (1) "http://steve-blogbook.blogspot.com/2008/02/blog-book-1-and-2.html" "http://www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogID=7614472316881962967&widgetType=BlogArchive&widgetId=BlogArchive1&action=editWidget""http://www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogID=7614472316881962967&widgetType=BlogArchive&widgetId=BlogArchive1&action=editWidget" About Me STEPHEN JEFFREY "http://www.blogger.com/profile/14349458777714033632" "http://www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogID=7614472316881962967&widgetType=Profile&widgetId=Profile1&action=editWidget""http://www.blogger.com/rearrange?blogID=7614472316881962967&widgetType=Profile&widgetId=Profile1&action=editWidget" t a super efficent baR6T*MjM~MM$NNN*OOO^PPP"QQQ2RBRRR`S~SSVTTT\UU(VVV:WWXXX`YYYZZZT[[[l\\(]@]]]t^^^P___d`|``aNaabb ccd&ddd@eNeeevff Sffhgg"hlhhiii6jrjjVkklPll,m|mm$nn oTooLpXpppHqq.rrrNss6tbttuuuvvvwwJxnxx yyyzjzzJ{{{J|||`}}~t~~>&`2j~ЃSЃNnԄ.p̅ZކJN`.t&8$2vfNhF>hZ8ܕ0VЖVx8tX0<x<&RSRn@ơ2N>(xXޥ(v(2l̪FL D jޮdF2*:Գ2vڶ6t&|Ⱥ(LλT` ^0TVjJFr,0DT2b~h>bJ lTnP^  h " "  " " h\n(2"'( ) @S   " "26T&K2jd4\\< "PS" $  08."2 "PS" $  080 "" $ 08: "" $ 08."0 "|" $ 086 "" "|$ 08. "PS" $ 088 "PS" $ 08."jl "ddh`bZRRRH " @ "PS" $  08."< "PS" $  08."2 "PS" $  08T 8>b4Definition TermDefinition ListH1H2H3H4H5H6Address Blockquote Preformattedz-Bottom of Form z-Top of Form p~ 0:P`vf " " " " " "|  ""| " "    "| " "    " " "   " "    " " "    " " "    "   " "|"|" " , "$  08)P2J' (@ J   O +%( u.0 78 c A@ (VJH SP \. " $  08u. " $  08u ttfЃRj\  0@