Dr. Glenn Starkman
Case Western Reserve University
Project Title
Can Cosmology Survive Without Birkhoff's Law?
Project Summary
General Relativity (GR) is one of the great intellectual triumphs of the 20th century. Einstein transformed space and time into a single dynamic entity, space-time, that affects the motion of the objects in it, yet is altered by them. But looking at galaxies and clusters we find matter in them moving too fast for gravity to hold them together. Dark matter is a possible explanation that we spend great effort searching for. GR also tells us that the cosmic expansion should be slowed by matter's gravity; yet it accelerates. Instead of abandoning GR, we invent dark energy. Perhaps GR is wrong on large scales. Alternative theories are emerging that are testable. But a fundamental problem is largely ignored: GR has special properties that enable us to calculate the behaviour of stars, galaxies, etc. Among these is Birkrhoff's Theorem. Loosely, it says the gravity inside a region is independent of the matter outside. Without this, the acceleration at one place could depend on all the masses in the universe. No GR alternative has a Birkhoff's Theorem. Can we compute reliably in these theories? If so, how? If not, what do we do?
Technical Abstract
General Relativity is among the great intellectual triumphs of the 20th century. Its conception of a dynamical space-time was revolutionary. But is GR correct on large scales? Matter bound within galaxies and clusters moves faster than GR self-gravity allows. We largely accept dark matter as the explanation and spend considerable effort searching for it. GR also implies that the cosmic expansion should be slowed by matter's gravity. Instead, it appears to accelerate. Again, instead of abandoning GR, we invent dark energy. Perhaps instead GR is wrong on large scales. Alternatives theories are emerging that can replace dark matter and energy, and they are testable. But there is a fundamental problem that is largely ignored. GR, despite all its non-linearity, obeys Birkrhoff's Theorem -- Gauss' Law for gravity. This underpins our ability to calculate accelerations within clumpy matter distributions. Without Birkhoff, one may be unable to compute gravity in many-body systems - the acceleration at a point may depend on the mass distribution everywhere. None of the suggested theories has a Birkhoff's Theorem. The question becomes - can we compute without it? If so, how? If not, how do we test them?
Hide Technical Abstract
General Relativity is among the great intellectual triumphs of the 20th century. Its conception of a dynamical space-time was revolutionary. But is GR correct on large scales? Matter bound within galaxies and clusters moves faster than GR self-gravity allows. We largely accept dark matter as the explanation and spend considerable effort searching for it. GR also implies that the cosmic expansion should be slowed by matter's gravity. Instead, it appears to accelerate. Again, instead of abandoning GR, we invent dark energy. Perhaps instead GR is wrong on large scales. Alternatives theories are emerging that can replace dark matter and energy, and they are testable. But there is a fundamental problem that is largely ignored. GR, despite all its non-linearity, obeys Birkrhoff's Theorem -- Gauss' Law for gravity. This underpins our ability to calculate accelerations within clumpy matter distributions. Without Birkhoff, one may be unable to compute gravity in many-body systems - the acceleration at a point may depend on the mass distribution everywhere. None of the suggested theories has a Birkhoff's Theorem. The question becomes - can we compute without it? If so, how? If not, how do we test them?
Hide Technical Abstract
Back to List of Awardees






